Five Things to Write Instead of "Just Checking In"

Nobody enjoys writing "just checking in". It is the sentence you type when you have nothing new to say but feel you should say something. It is also, for the person receiving it, a request to do work on your behalf. Here is why it fails, and five things to write instead that are not clever tricks.

Table of contents

Why that sentence exists

It exists because of an information problem, not a writing problem. You sent something. You heard nothing. You have no idea whether it was read, ignored, lost, or forwarded to someone who has not got to it yet. With nothing to go on, the only honest message is "I am still here", and "just checking in" is the polite way to say that.

Which means the fix is upstream. Get information, and the sentence writes itself. That is most of what reading the shape of the opens is for.

What it signals to the person reading it

Three things, none of them good.

That you are waiting. Your inbox pressure becomes their problem, and nobody answers faster because someone else is anxious.

That there is nothing new. You have just told them, explicitly, that this email contains no information. You have asked them to read something you described as empty.

That the next step is theirs to invent. A message with no proposal leaves the recipient to decide what happens now. That is work, and work gets postponed.

The rule: lead with what is new

Every follow-up that works starts with something that did not exist when you last wrote. New information, new context, a new deadline, a new answer to a question they did not ask yet.

If nothing is new, you have two options, and pretending is not one of them. Either make something new, which is usually possible, or wait, which is usually cheap.

Five replacements that are not tricks

1. The answer to a question they have not asked. "One thing I should have included: the migration takes two days, not two weeks. Sending it in case that was the open question."

2. A constraint that is genuinely real. Not a fake deadline. A real one: a price that changes, a slot that closes, a team that is booked. If you do not have one, skip this.

3. A shorter version. "Shorter version of my last email: two options, 900 or 1400, both start in October. Which one do you want me to detail?" Sometimes the first email was simply too long to answer in a gap between meetings.

4. Something useful with no strings. An article, a benchmark, a competitor's announcement that affects them. It works because it is not about you.

5. The clean exit. "I do not want to keep landing in your inbox. If this is not the moment, tell me and I will stop." It gets answered more often than anything else on this list, and the answer is often not the one you feared.

Using the open as the trigger, not as the content

If you track your emails, the open tells you when to send one of those five. It should never tell you what to write.

"I saw you opened my email three times" is the worst sentence in sales. It moves the conversation from your offer to your surveillance, and the recipient now has a reason to feel watched instead of helped.

Use it silently. Someone reopening a proposal on Thursday morning is someone who has it in mind on Thursday morning. Send the shorter version that afternoon and say nothing about how you knew.

When to stop writing altogether

After the clean exit, if there is no answer, stop. Not because a rule says three follow-ups, but because you have now offered the easiest possible reply, a single word, and it did not come.

Silence after an explicit exit is an answer. Treat it as one and put the energy somewhere it moves. Our article on how many follow-ups to send goes into the arithmetic.

Conclusion

"Just checking in" is a symptom. It shows up when you are writing without information, and it announces that fact to the reader in the first five words.

Get the information, then write the email that information makes possible. And if you still have nothing new to say, the most professional thing available is to say nothing at all for another week.

Frequently asked questions

Is "just following up" any better?

No. Same sentence with a different coat. So is "bumping this to the top of your inbox", which additionally tells them you think your email deserves to outrank the rest of their day.

How long should I wait before the first follow-up?

Three working days is a reasonable floor for a cold email, less if there was a meeting. Most emails that will be opened are opened quickly; see how long until an email is opened.

Should the follow-up be in the same thread?

Usually yes, so the original is one scroll away. Start a new thread with a different subject only when you suspect the first one never arrived.

Does adding urgency work?

Real urgency works. Invented urgency works once, and costs you the next three emails.

What if they opened it many times and still did not reply?

That usually means interest plus an obstacle, often internal. Make the obstacle easier to move: a one-page summary they can forward, or an answer to the objection their colleague is likely raising.

All articles